Blog

On Friday last week I paid a visit to my old school (Northway Midddle) which is due to be demolished in the next few weeks to make room for houses. I left the school in 1984, the year that it was closed, and even then it was clear that the preferred option of many was to pull it down and make room for houses. Ever since, the building has remained standing in a kind of limbo, part community centre, part office space and having heard the decision last week to finally put the place out of its misery - a decision which seems absurd given its potential (potential which the council couldn't see if it picked up a football and did six hours of keepy-ups) - I decided to try and gain entry and take a few photographs before it's lost forever.



Granted, Northway School is not the most beautiful of buildings, but with its gym and playing fields, art room (including a walk-in kiln) and stage it could have been turned into a first class sports and cultural centre. Of course the council were as unimaginative in 1984 as they are today and instead it became a wasted space. And whatever the merits - or otherwise - of the building itself, it's nonetheless a piece of the area's heritage. It's played a major part in the lives of many people and deserves to be recorded.

Therefore with my camera I endeavoured to do just that. I had been warned that the interior of the building had been altered a great deal after 1984 but even so I wanted to find something, one image that encapuslated what the place meant to me and many others. Standing inside the building for the first time in 25 years I could see just how much it had changed (rather like myself), and as I walked around in the company of the caretaker, I found that my memories were somehow scrambled as if by by the stud walls and altered layouts of the rooms. Nevertheless I started taking pictures, attempting to jump start my memory, as if the camera was a defribulator for my brain.



The stairwell hadn't changed a bit and I could almost hear the sound of the school bell and voices chattering. But in most parts of the school's trashed interior it was as if I was walking in a place I'd never been to before. Even the view through the windows had changed almost beyond recognition. The John Radcliffe hospital loomed ever larger and the playground had already been turned into houses. Only the imposing tower block on the estate anchored the view in the past, and catching a glimpse of it through a few of the windows started the memories coming.



After about half an hour and having walked around the school from top to bottom, I began at last to recall things, to see memories much more clearly. I was able to remove the stud walls and new corridors and reimagine how the place had looked when I was there. I remembered the maths room and Mr Smith. I could recall how he'd turn on the lights before appearing. In looking out the window, I could also remember that I'd been in this room when my grandad had died on January 13th 1984. It was around 2.15pm when he passed away.



Perhaps the room I remembered most clearly and that which was the most recognisable was Mrs. Bantam's. She was my teacher in the first year and even though the room was just a shell, I could easily recall how things had looked, what it was like to move around inside. The way we move around a given space and the way memories are 'attached' to such a movement became very apparent here. Whereas before (except on the stairwell) familiar paths through the building had been blocked by 'new' partitions and so on (particularly in the third year area), here those paths remained intact. Memory isn't only triggered by what we see and hear and what we smell, but the way we move through a space. Memory is kinaesthetic.



After about an hour I had to leave, finishing with photographs of the windowsills into which some pupils had scratched their names.



As I think back to my visit, I don't so much see the things I saw then, the images which you can see on the photographs, but rather my memories, which despite the altered condition of the interior have become sharper - at least in places.



The above picture was once the science room, the domain of Mr. Hipkiss. The room I remember as being dark. There were high wooden desks, a blackboard in the corner and the strange lingering smell of chemicals which were kept in a room at the front of the class. We had to cover our books in wallpaper (woodchip in my case) and it was in this room that I first heard the word Google. In fact, I now recall how Mr. Hipkiss had written the number (a Googleplex, one comprising umpteen noughts) on a long sheet of paper. I can see it now on the wall. I seem to remember black blinds which might account for the fuliginous aspect of my memory and the faces Mr. Hipkiss drew of eminent scientists which were always photocopied so the text and drawings were pink. They weren't true likenesses, he told us. He had made them all up.



The above picture shows the old art room and at the back was where we had cookery lessons with Mrs. Braybrooke.



This room was a basic woodworking room and general craft area which had a walk-in kiln. So which photograph encapsulates my time at the school? Well it would have to be the second photograph in this blog, that which I reproduced below.



Memories are, as I said kinaesthetic and nowhere are the paths through the school better preserved than on the stairwell. How many times did I walk up and down them? Impossible to say. All I know now is that I won't ever again and soon no-one ever will.

Today, my brother Simon and I took a trip down memory lane and visited New Marston First School which had opened its doors as part of its anniversary celebrations. The school had opened in 1949 and 27 years later, in 1976 I began my time there, leaving four years later to attend Northway Middle school. Simon had started three years earlier than me and it was hard to believe that some 30 years and more had passed since that time. I can still recall quite clearly my time at nursery (a stone's throw away) and my first visit to the school when I was four years old. I'd made a picture of a lamb with polystyrene balls - or rather out of polystyrene balls I should perhaps say. And so there I was today, almost ten times the age I'd be when I first walked through the gates; if I was to return ten times my current age I'd be getting on for 400; dead in other words and a little upsetting for the children of 2409.

Almost straight away, as soon as we walked through the gates I began to feel a wave of nostalgia flooding not so much over me, but within me; 'welling within me' would perhaps be a better phrase for I could sense the place physically; I could recall walking there as a child. Much of it looks much the same, although of course things have changed, a few new doors, a new bicycle shed (or is it shelter now?) and so on, but essentially little else had been altered. However, after 30 years or more things are bound to be different and nowhere was this more evident than at what had been the swimming pool; a place beloved by my nostalgic mind, but loathed at the time by my feeble little body.

The changing rooms were always, to say the least, basic; sheds (or were they shelters?) comprising holes, breezeblocks and a corrugated roof. They were insubstantial then and just about standing in their decrepitude now, but the pool itself, if anything does remain is now lost in a jungle of trees, brambles and weeds. I couldn't imagine a scene more different from what I could remember; indeed, if the whole plot had been cleared and a new block built in its place it wouldn't have seemed as changed. It was shocking to see that part of my childhood had already become in part a ruin - but not just a ruin, rather, one undiscovered in the midst of sprawling vegetation. The swimming pool had become the equivalent - albeit less dramatic - of a Mayan temple lost in a Mexican jungle.

Nature was reclaiming a part of my childhood, much as it had recovered the graves I'd seen at Highgate cemetery and I was reminded of the words of Walter Benjamin and his concept of 'Natural History' which is not, as we might suppose, the history of nature, but rather a term to describe the manner in which the 'artefacts of human history acquire an aspect of mute, natural being at the point where they begin to lose their place in a viable form of life.' I'd always thought about this definition in respect to ruins and other monuments of the past, and yet here it was, perfectly illustrated at the remains of a pool in which I used to swim (and in which I'd gained my 10 metre swimming badge).

Standing at the back of the pool and looking into the undergrowth, I could almost hear the sound of the water; I could remember the grey clouds which always seemed to gather whenever it was swim-day. And looking at the backs of the changing rooms, I could see in my mind's eye, the board on which the temperature was always chalked and which was never above 16^oC.

Inside, the school had changed very little. The main hall straight in front was everything I remembered it being - although there was a new floor (the old floor was a brown tiled one with a tennis court marked - for some reason - in tape) but before we could go inside we were greeted and taken to the 'anniversary display' in what was, in our day at least, the east-end of the school and a very different place to the west. It has to be said that the display left something to be desired. There were a few documents from the 1950s and 90s, but very little from the 70s which rather surprised me. Still, I was rather more interested in looking around and walking the length of the 'east-end' corridor the memories soon returned. But these memories were not so much of specific things but rather a general sense of having been there before a long time ago. They were memories insofar as I could recall images, albeit vague, and could recognise differences (it's in the differences - what's not there and what has been added - that memories are perhaps most clearly defined), but these memories were as much physical as cerebral; they were sensations rather than impressions. Now this may not be the time to begin discussing the kinaesthetic nature of memory or the notion of consciousness as corporeal (embodied mind as opposed to a mind/body dualism) but I was interested in how my visit to the school would help me in my recent work with phenomenological perception… but more of that later.

At the end of the east-end corridor is a small incline on which we used to stand in line to get our dinner. The canteen itself has now been moved (to what was a cloakroom) but looking at the room from the outside I couldn't get over how small it was. My memories of the canteen have always been of a large room, full of echoes in which hundreds of children sat and ate their food. Looking at it today I could see how my memory had 'grown' the interior to match my body in the years that had passed. It was a fraction of the size I'd remembered.

Looking at what is now called the sports hall - opposite what was the canteen - I could see that something was different but couldn't tell exactly what that something was. Initially, and consciously at least, I thought that nothing much had changed, but a change had been registered somewhere, because when we went outside, I could see straight away that most of the old large windows had been blocked off which answered the question 'what's different?' that had been there all the time.

The more we walked through the school, so more changes became apparent. Where the school had previously been one long corridor, there were now several doors dividing it up. This, I would imagine, has as much to do with fire safety as anything else and called to mind how when we were at school the fire alarm was the headmaster, Mr. Norris, who during drills walked through the school ringing a bell. In the event of a real fire, one imagines he might well have run rather than walked and shouted 'Fire! Get out! Get out!' just to be sure.

In the main hall, which we'd glimpsed when we first arrived, things - apart from the floor and a scattering of technology - had changed very little. The wall-bars still stood against one of the walls and the stage still stood musing upon my past successes.

Boy in dressing gown was one notable part. A snake-charmer in Little Mookra another. But the crowning achievement was Prince Florenzel in Snow White. When I was meant to be proclaiming to the audience of my love for Snow White I was indisposed in the toilet. The stone steps leading to the stage (from the toilet) are still as they were; as clear and as sparkly as the memory itself. Indeed, along with these steps, there was a lot that was quite unchanged.

The clothes pegs, benches and shoe-baskets of one of the old cloakrooms were still in place. But it wasn't so much things still in situ or things that had changed which prompted a rush of memories, as the line we were walking.

What was most familiar to me as we walked through the school was the shape of the corridor, the shape of the 'line' we followed. Therefore, the nostalgia pangs (for want of a better way of putting it) weren't so much the result of a mental response to the school but also a physical one. Or, to take the argument I alluded to previously, the response was that of an embodied mind; in other words, we don't remember things in the mind and as a consequence feel a physical response, but rather they are one and the same thing. The recollection isn't only triggered through our senses (in this case our vision) but by our physical position in a place, by our being in that place; we sense and think with our bodies.

I felt this particularly strongly in the playground in which there was a notable absence of climbing frames - proper climbing frames that is, with metal bars and concrete underneath. As I walked across the playground to the door which led back into the west-end corridor I found myself 'physically thinking' of times associated with my being at the school; my nan's garden, summer holidays and our house in Coniston Avenue. It wasn't so much just recalling memories but somehow experiencing them.

After 40 minutes or so we left, and it was a very strange feeling to walk back through the gates, doing something so clearly connected with going home, to where we lived as children. The view up the hill only served to pull the body in that direction.

Instead however we turned left and walked towards our old Middle School - Northway, which is now something of a community centre; I say something, as from the outside it looks more than a little care-worn. Again, the same pangs of nostalgia took a hold as I walked through the gate, and again these sensations came about as a result of being in that particular place. Seeing a photograph brings back memories, but that is very different to feeling them. In looking at a images of something as it was may bring about visual memories. But being in a place makes them physical

Like the swimming pool at New Marston, I haven't seen something so fundamentally altered (and which has made such an impact on me) as the playground - or rather, the place where the playground used to be. The whole area including a large piece of land surrounding what was the second year area has now become a small housing development. The problem is that part of the school or community centre or whatever it's meant to be now appears utterly incongruous.

To have a school gym abutting a bungalow is odd at the very least; in terms of my remembering the past and how things used to be it was utterly absurd. Of course things change, but one would have thought that planners could have been a little more imaginative in how the school was incorporated into the development and how in turn the development was incorporated into the school.

The gym and the second year classrooms, of which I have very fond memories, looked like a limb tied off from the body of the school, and as a result they appeared lifeless and in need of removal

Having left the school and returned to the car we drove past our childhood home in Coniston Avenue. All roads from the two schools we'd visited seemed to take us there but when we drove past we saw clearly how the passage of time could change things, again for the worse. Since my dad left a few years back the house has gradually fallen into a state of disrepair, but this has become a whole lot worse and the house looks on its way to becoming derelict. The fences have gone, the garage is boarded up and most shockingly of all, the large oak tree which played such a part in my childhood, being feature of the small world that I knew and fuelling my imagination has been cut down. We drove past quickly so I didn't have time to take it all in, but in that split second I found a gap which couldn't be filled by a hundred years of looking.

My girlfriend and I recently visited the east coast of Sicily staying in the small resort of Letojanni, a sleepy town resting in its own shadows and living in the shadow (at least as far as the tourist is concerned) of the town of Taormina, perched as it is high on Monte Tauro from where it commands spectacular views of the Ionian sea.

The hotel we stayed in was itself perched high upon the rocks and was accessible through a tunnel, at the end of which a lift took us up through the rocks to the hotel reception, groaning as it did so like an old, unwilling porter carrying heavy luggage. I always judge a hotel by its reception (particularly when I first arrive) and that of the Hotel Antares came as something of a relief. It looked good. It was clean and spacious. And at 1.30am, when we arrived it was empty.

We checked in, took our key and made our way to the room, and, as we climbed to the fourth floor (in another lift) we had the impression the hotel had seen better days. It seemed slightly old fashioned, and, for the moment, as if we were the only guests. Of course, come the morning, that all changed. There is something to be said for arriving in a place when it's dark, of going straight to bed and waking in the morning eager to unwrap the view. We threw back the curtains and found the sun, the sea and a beautiful view of Monte Tauro, one spoiled only a little by the raised road which ran just below the hotel. Another criterion on which to judge a hotel is the breakfast and the Hotel Antares didn't disappoint. Nor for that matter did the dinner. We were staying half-board so it was with some trepidation that we went to the dining room that first evening. It was a canteen-style buffet, but the quality of the food and the variety was excellent. The only thing we didn't like were the cakes; big, colourful (especially the vivid green of the pistachio) and so moist as to ultimately be lacking in substance. If you could eat a rain-cloud that is how they'd be (but not green of course).

The hotel's Maitre D' looked like Bill Murray, the actor, aptly enough from the film 'Lost in Translation'. With his deadpan face and monotone voice he seemed cheerful enough, but his smile belied his cynicism. He enjoyed the same joke every day which invariably involved his wireless palm-held computer into which he would type the orders for the drinks before showing the screen to the guest like a magician asking an audience member to pick a card. On the first day I was presented with the device so I could acknowledge what I was buying (it just goes to show how little attention one pays when buying drinks this way - I only realised the price of the wine when it came to checking out at the end of the holiday). On the screen was a photograph of porn-star turned politician Cicciolina. Of course I laughed politely then looked to Monika for help. "Oh Cicciolina," she said. I hadn't even remembered her name. Bill Murray tried the same joke on some elderly Belgians (who made up most of the hotel's clientele) who seemed to laugh harder - but then they laughed at 'Popcorn TV' (a particularly feeble version of Candid Camera) on the way home on the plane.

For a couple of days of our week long stay, we relaxed by the pool and for the rest of the time went on excursions to Etna, Siracusa, Savoca and Forza D'Agro. But before I discuss those I must first describe the pool attendant.

He was slim, handsome and somewhat pigeon-chested and had started the job on the day we arrived. He certainly seemed a little unsure of the job (but by no means unsure of himself) and would spend a great deal of time doing not very much very well (much as how a newbie in any job does something as meaningless as sharpening a pencil with the care and expertise normally reserved for a surgeon). At first he seemed to be just that (not a surgeon); a rookie lifeguard/pool attendant/poser who didn't have enough to do, but as the week went on I found him more unsettling (I did overhear another English guest describe him as 'creepy'). He stood at the edges of the pool like an Antony Gormley figure such as you might find on a rooftop or on a beach looking out to sea. He would move occasionally and resume his study of things as if he was the sculpture and the gaze of the sculptor combined. He would lean and check the alignment of sunbeds, making sure they were exactly as they should be. The lack of anything to do on that first day which had caused him to do inane things like lining up the beds, had grown within a week into a case of obsessive behavioural disorder. And if children or old people were swimming, he would 'guard' them, by looking at them from behind his shades, standing with like an automaton, his arms hanging almost akimbo (his hands not quite upon his hips), a creature unable to comprehend what it meant to be human let alone a human on holiday. Straight lines, that was what he understood. Straight lines and sunbeds. But these people playing? This noise? This irregularity? He had power over the sunbeds but not people, and so he watched them from behind his shades, his head twitching like C3P0.

Whenever I've been away, I always try and think of something which encapsulates the trip. So what do I remember most about Sicily?

Colour is one thing; not only the vivid green of the pistachio cake and the mint granite (which looked and tasted like ice crushed with washing-up liquid - the limone flavour was however wonderful) but the faded paint on doorways and the abundant, beautiful flowers.

Indeed, the flowers were something which really took me by surprise. I like flowers but am not someone who gets excited in garden-centres or for that matter in gardens. But in Sicily it was different, they did excite me; from the wild flowers frothing beside the pathway from Castelmola to Taormina; to the violet fountain, cascading down a façade in Ortigia, Siracusa, and the pointillist dabs on the crumbling houses in Forza D'Agro (houses which seemed held up by the power of a gasp). Lines and shadows and balconies are other things I recall, but I shall return to these later.

Our first expedition was to Mount Etna, Europe's biggest (and currently active) volcano (in the last ten years alone there have been five eruptions). We made our way there on the bus stopping first at the site of one of the more recent lava flows which, although it's now cold, grey and as still as the rocks on which surrounding towns have been built, retains nonetheless a sense of its original movement; that which caused villagers to look to the Heavens for help as it moved towards them (of course, the rocks in Sicily are never always still, something to which residents would no doubt testify).

One can imagine how it must have felt when the slow river of black stone was a moving mass of molten lava. As it headed towards one of Etna's outlying villages, the residents began to pray for help and, just as the lava reached them, its progress was stopped, as if a pouncing lion had been miraculously turned into stone. Thanks of course was given to the Virgin Mary and a glistening white statue of her and the infant Jesus was erected at the head of the great cascade of rocks. But not only does this juxtaposition of white against the grey lend the statue a divine air, but perhaps, more importantly it seems to mark the lava out as malign, as something intentionally bad rather than a purely natural, if devastating phenomenon.

These primeval eruptions point to a time when mankind was not even a feature upon the earth and like any natural 'disaster' they serve to remind us of our place in the scheme of things, of the comparative brevity of human history as opposed to that of nature. An interesting point about the statue is the fact that Mary is placed facing away from the progress of the lava when one might have assumed that she would be positioned facing towards the vast black scar, her palm towards the lava like a traffic cop stopping a car. Instead, she seems to be leading it, as if the rocks are in something of a procession behind her (processions are of course a big thing in Sicily). The statue is in some respects an image of ourselves, and its placement at the head of the lava flow perhaps suggests that we, in the scheme of things come before nature. In time no doubt, more rocks will come and overtake us.

One can certainly understand why people have always been in awe of Etna - it inspires such emotions when seen today, whether from afar or up close. It makes one feel very insignificant; it makes history itself appear insignificant, particularly when one considers the recorded eruptions as far back as Virgil. The distinction between the natural world and natural history and that of the recorded history of man is clear. To us, Virgil appears - indeed as he is - as very distant figure. To Etna, the intervening time, as slow to man as rocks themselves, must pass like yet another lava flow.

Once at the volcano, we climbed aboard the creaking cable-cars (replacements for those destroyed in the eruption of 1983) which took us to a 'half-way' point where we could hire winter coats for 2 Euros and board the large jeep-buses.

These took us through the roads cut into the stratified snow which dripped as it thawed in the sun (again I thought of natural history; of molten rocks) and after about 15 minutes, we arrived at one of the craters. At once the sight was spectacular, not only physically but also the light, the movement of shadows upon the snow, the tiny shapes of people on the zigzag horizon.

As we paced around the crater, bending down to touch the hot rocks, it was easy to imagine this place as a portal to the Underworld, the beginnings of a 'Wellsian' journey with ample nods to Hieronymous Bosch. The imagination could indeed run riot in such a space, while all the senses can do is stand still in the face of such incredible natural beauty, and again, as I stood and took in the view (or was it the view that took in all of us) I thought again of Mary at the head of the petrified flow; the imagined versus the real.

Things cascade in Sicily. Villages cascade down the rocky hills on which they're built and flowers tumble down the hillsides. Tourists move like lava through the streets of Taormina, eating up the town with the every click of their cameras. Time however seems to sit; perhaps on the steps of the town's Teatro Greco.

Although it's called the Teatro Greco, it is predominantly Roman, dating from around the 1st and 2nd century AD. The steps are largely intact (with some wooden seating built around the topmost part) and between the ancient stones, grass and wild flowers grow, retaining the integrity of the ruins. The theatre itself (like the bigger theatre in Siracusa) is still used today, and while I like the idea of theatre continuing on a site where plays have been performed for almost two millennia, I can't help but think it would be better to see the place without the wooden stage, the scaffolding and the wooden seating.

Ruins become, as Christopher Woodward writes in his excellent book 'In Ruins' a work of nature rather than man. Certainly the flowers on the steps are testament to this. And again we have the contrast between man and nature which is everywhere in this part of Sicily. Ruins are melancholic places, but at the same time strangely uplifting. Gustave Flaubert enjoyed Ruins. Woodward writes how in a letter to a friend in 1846, he wrote about some ruins he visited:

"I thought," he wrote, "about the dead whom I had never known and on whom my feet trampled. I love above all the sight of vegetation resting upon old ruins; this embrace of nature, coming swiftly to bury the work of man the moment his hand is no longer there to defend it, fills me with deep and ample joy."

In his book, On Creaturely Life, Eric L Santner, in discussing Walter Benjamin's understanding of Natural History (Naturgeschichte), writes how Natural History in Benjamin's parlance refers not the fact that nature has a history but that artefacts of human history acquire an aspect of mute, natural being at the point where they begin to lose their place in a viable form of life. This mute being can be heard in the silence which drifts in and out of the theatre, as if the sound of the voices of all those who would have once been seated there. This silence was punctuated only by the cries of tourists, a few of whom felt the urge to find their own echo, calling out like fools; shouting their own names almost as if before the empty steps on which Time was sitting, they felt the need to perform.

As we sat on the steps that morning, before the crowds had gathered to strut upon the stage, we gazed out through the breach in the ruins, between what remained of the Doric columns, at the magnificent sight of Etna. Who needs a stage when one can see such a view behind? (It was in the theatre that I came to ask myself the question, what is a view? Why do we like to stand and look at the view? But the answer to that is for another time.)

Having left the theatre we passed a shop selling old prints of the town. One of them was a scene from the theatre, a painting made in the 18th century showing the theatre for the most part covered with grass, with just the brick backdrop and columns recognisable today. And I couldn't help but wish it still looked that way. Visiting the ancient Greek theatre at Siracusa a few days later, we were disappointed to find that much of it had been covered with boards for people to sit and watch a performance and again I couldn't help but question the use of ancient places for this purpose. It might seem apposite perhaps, but ultimately it robs the place of its beauty and the ruins of their integrity - perhaps even purpose. It's akin to the squawks and barks of the tourist searching out his echo; an attempt to mollify the progression of time and our own mortality.

There are of course different types of ruin in Sicily. There are those caused by time and those by seismic activity (Siracusa itself was almost entirely destroyed by an earthquake in 1693, indeed, in Goethe's 'Italian Journey', written in the 1780s, the great man didn't visit, understanding that "little now remained of that once glorious city but its name"). There are the ancient ruins (such as the theatres) and those which are ruins of the present day, ruins 'in progress' as it were.

On a trip to two villages in the hills around Taormina, we found examples of the latter (places too where parts of the Godfather trilogy were filmed). In Forza D'Agro, I fell in love with the dry decay of the buildings on which, like the steps in the Teatro Greco, flowers were growing. Even on inhabited buildings, flowers were sprouting from the rooftops, as if reminding us of the certainty to follow.

Again in Woodward's book, the author tells us of an English botanist called Richard Deakin, who described the ruins of the Colosseum in his book Flora of the Colosseum (1855). Woodward writes that

"…to the sensitive botanist flowers 'form a link in the memory, and teach us hopeful and soothing lessons, amid the sadness of bygone ages: and cold indeed must be the heart that does not respond to their silent appeal; for though without speech, they tell us of the regenerating power which animates the dust of mouldering greatness.'"

This 'power' again reminds me of the difference between natural and human history. It serves to remind me that flowers were here long before man and will be here long after we have gone.

And again there was the curious juxtaposition of those wild flowers springing from the fissures, and those contained in window-boxes. Of course they are similar in many respects, but ultimately they say very different things.

It was almost as if those placed in boxes, and set upon the balconies as decorations were tamed; they were like the actors in the ruins, denying time and the certainty that awaits empires and individuals alike; the flowers in the pots will die before the building, but those on the walls and rooftops will survive it. (The statue of Mary at the head of the rupestrian procession has power over the rocks; the lady with her window box has power over the flowers.)

In some places ruins are inhabited; they are integrated into newer structures and as a result, these structures becoming living palimpsests. In Taormina, we walked alongside an ancient Roman Cistern, a long, beautiful, brick-built edifice in which one could see the mastery of Roman engineering and craftsmanship.

On top of it, apartments had been built. Also in Taormina, we came upon a small Roman amphitheatre which was in the process of being excavated. In some respects this ruin was one of the most authentic we saw, in that it was located amongst a number of houses which had been built upon it over the course of the last two millennia. I'm not sure why this felt more 'alive' than the other theatres we saw. Perhaps because although a ruin, and one which had been uncovered, it was nonetheless a part of the living town, just as when it was first constructed. One didn't go to see the ruin per se, but rather stumbled upon it.

I've always been drawn to doorways, particularly those that are blocked up. In Sicily I couldn't help but photograph those that were both blocked up and open; ruined doorways through which people would once have passed during the course of the everyday lives, through which now only the grass and the flowers made their way. They were doorways through which time had passed and through which nothing would be coming back again. Some were boarded up, to deter thieves or squatters; or perhaps it was the time itself the doors were closed to?

I wondered as the week went by whether living in the shadow of Etna made the denial of death much stronger in this place? I don't know, but certainly the desire to prolong life and to deny mortality is apparent. Death is something to be overcome. Those who believe, believe in a final victory over death as if like the lava flow it's something malign rather than entirely natural, something which can be stopped in its tracks. The very idea that death has been around longer than mankind doesn't seem to figure in people's thinking. They look for help in comprehending non-existence by calling upon the saints, by perpetuating life in an imagined afterlife. And perhaps the ultimate symbol of man's inability to comprehend death, or rather non-existence, was what we saw in Savoca, one of the two villages where time slowly chews the buildings.

In a priory, we entered a room in which, along the floor a number of temporary coffins were laying, inside each of which were the mummified remains of some of Savoca's past residents. Priests, lawyers and doctors all lay with pained expressions, still dressed in their funerary clothes. Two of the bodies from the eighteenth century were dressed in all their 'finery' and I couldn't help but imagine them, as we left and walked around the village, walking the same roads three hundred years ago. 'Normally,' these mummies are displayed standing up, perhaps to maintain the idea that they are somehow still alive, or still a part of the world. I must say I didn't find them macabre or even creepy, but instead rather sad. The name Giuseppe was scrawled in marker-pen on the end of one of the boxes; a name which was now just a label, one which meant nothing anymore where once it had once meant something. It was a name that belonged to a living being, a name which had rebounded from the walls and facades of Savoca itself. To see the same name on a tombstone would inspire thoughts of a living person. When one sees names on tombstones, one knows that friends and family of the deceased would have seen that same name and remembered the living being. To see it on the coffin, scrawled with a marker-pen robbed the body of any life it might once have had.

The remains themselves were fairly pitiful (even if I found them interesting). They looked, as I said, pained, and dressed in their decaying clothes and lying in their boxes, reminded me of the dried flowers in their window boxes, rather than the wild flowers growing on the steps of the Teatro Greco, in places where people whose names and bodies have long been lost to time, once sat. Unable to let them go, friends and family deny them the afterlife of memory and condemn them to a perpetual existence as objects. Rilke wrote that to die is: 'to leave even our name behind us as a child leaves off playing with a broken toy'. And in a sense, these bodies are broken toys with which others cannot stop playing.

One of the most beautiful places we visited was the city of Siracusa, the ancient city of Syracuse. The town as I said was all but levelled in the earthquake of 1693 and was rebuilt almost entirely in the Baroque style with beautiful churches, palaces and houses.

The Piazza del Duomo in Ortigia (the ancient nucleus of Siracusa) has recently been restored and is a spectacular sight. There are some beautiful buildings here, but the most fabulous has to be the Duomo itself, whose incredible age can be glimpsed in the via Minerva where surviving Doric columns of an ancient Greek temple can be seen forming the skeleton of the building. Inside, the columns can be seen embedded in the walls, in an interior space which is in stark contrast to the rich Baroque facade.

But of all the wonderful sights of Siracusa, including the numerous and beautiful Baroque doorways, the things which I will perhaps remember most are the balconies. I like to see things restored - the Piazza del Duomo is a fine example of how it should be done, but I also like (and perhaps prefer) to see things that are past their best (except that is for Hotels - these should always be immaculate). Everywhere in Siracusa there seemed to be balconies and almost all of them were beautifully carved, with tiny details that one could blink and miss, but which would have held the attention of their makers for days and weeks on end. There is something about their position in the street, the space they occupy, the views they would have afforded those who stood or sat upon them hundreds of years ago. (Having read Gaston Bachelard's 'The Poetics of Space' whilst away, I could probably wax lyrical about them for hours, but that perhaps is for another time.)

They are rather like the steps of the Teatro Greco in Taormina. One gets the impression that the past sits upon them looking down at the world carrying on below; they are places from where a gaze might emanate, and when one looks up, aware of being watched, one finds that no-one is there.

In Siracusa I found some graffiti which caught my eye; a section of wall which I thought particularly beautiful.

On it names had been scratched into the painted fabric of the wall. From one line gouged into the surface, from one name, hundreds have since been added, creating a palimpsest on which successive names have erased those that came before them, albeit not entirely. Lines are left which seem to connect to others, which no longer spell names but instead make patterns for us to follow.

Siracusa is a city of lines; names scratched into walls, the trace of gazes, the wires which run across the facades of its buildings, which join the houses and seem to hold the place together. In 'Invisible Cities' Italo Calvino, through the character of Marco Polo, describes Venice as many different cities: some of those cities could easily be Siracusa.

"In Ersilia, to establish the relationships that sustain the city's life, the inhabitants stretch strings from the corners of the houses, white or black or gray or black-and-white according to whether they mark a relationship of blood, of trade, authority, agency. When the strings become so numerous that you can no longer pass among them, the inhabitants leave: the houses are dismantled; only the strings and their supports remain.

From a mountainside, camping with their house¬hold goods, Ersilia's refugees look at the labyrinth of taut strings and poles that rise in the plain. That is the city of Ersilia still, and they are nothing.

They rebuild Ersilia elsewhere. They weave a simi¬lar pattern of strings which they would like to be more complex and at the same time more regular than the other.

Then they abandon it and take them¬selves and their houses still farther away.

Thus, when traveling in the territory of Ersilia, you come upon the ruins of the abandoned cities, without the walls which do not last, without the bones of the dead which the wind rolls away: spider¬webs of intricate relationships seeking a form."

The names in the graffiti are themselves reduced to lines, web-like structures seeking a form, re-seeking the names they were and the bodies they once belonged to. We look up at the balconies, searching out the eyes from which the line of a gaze might have come from.

Most people lost to the past did not leave their names, but nonetheless left something of themselves. In the Parco Archeologico della Neapolis in Siracusa, there is a cave called the Ear of Dionysius (Caravaggio is said to have coined the phrase after suggesting it looked like a human ear). It is a vast chamber cut from the rock by prisoners and is some 60 metres in length and 20 metres in height. In many respects one could say that they have carved their name collectively into the stone, a name in which today we can certainly find an echo.

On the last day of our holiday we went to the beach on Letojanni. I've always had a fondness for grey stones with lines in them - there is a formal quality which I like and having found a particularly beautiful specimen we began to collect others and to put them together, creating a single line from many different stones.

Stones are in themselves incredible things, objects of an age far exceeding that of the Teatro Greco, the Temple of Apollo in Siracusa and even that of Etna. They are almost beyond our imagination and yet we can hold them in our hands. I have already looked at the lines of Siracusa, the lines of names scratched into the walls and so on, and so it's fitting to end on the lines found in each of these stones.

The line in these photographs is man-made; we have made it and yet the lines in the stones have been 'written' by the earth itself, by geological processes over unimaginably long periods of time. Placing them together was rather like looking at the graffitied names in Siracusa, written over and over one on top of the other; picking a line and following it, to make sense of something lost or forgotten, creating something new as a result.

As Christopher Woodward writes regarding ruins:

"Each spectator is forced to supply the missing pieces from his or her own imagination and a ruin therefore appears differently to everyone."

Pebbles (and pebble beaches) are themselves ruins; ruins of the world millions of years ago, and just as in the Teatro Greco, we have to use our imaginations to fill the gaps between the extant stones. In any old place, we have the juxtaposition between the ancient past and immediate present. The white lines upon the stones could almost be a trail of paint, drizzled upon the stones like that dripped by Pollock onto his canvases. The trails appear instantaneous and yet as we know, they are older than mankind. They are both the ancient past and now, combined; a phrase which seems to encapsulate this place - Sicily - perfectly.

A selection of photographs from the trip can be found on Flickr.

I'd known about Highgate cemetery, principally as the last resting place of Karl Marx, but this was the first time I had visited it. Having left Archways Tube station, Monika and I walked up Highgate Hill, through the pleasant surroundings of Waterlow Park and found ourselves outside a large iron gate, standing amongst a small group of people waiting to go in. The cemetery itself is divided into two sections; the older West and the newer East. The East side can be visited at any time, but the West can only be accessed as part of a guided tour. It was for this tour that we along with a dozen others waited our turn.

I had the feeling that we were queuing to be let inside a prison. Not that I've ever queued for such a reason. It was simply the fact that we were locked outside waiting for our appointed time to visit, when those kept behind the walls would be allowed to receive us (there is something similar too in the architecture of the gatehouse and that which one sees in some Victorian prisons). Also, I couldn't help but think of King Kong - the wall and the gates behind which the giant beast was kept. There was certainly a sense of anticipation, which had, it seems, been in part been created by the cemetery's architect Stephen Geary.

The way into the cemetery itself, from the courtyard, is via a flight of steps. When standing in the courtyard, the cemetery cannot be seen; it's only when walking through the archway leading to the steps, at the top of which one can see the greenery and the first of the monuments, that this vast cemetery is slowly revealed.

There is certainly more than a hint of theatre in how one enters, and the fact one ascends the stairs into the world of the dead serves to reflect a belief in the continuity of life after death; by ascending the steps we follow in the footsteps of those long since passed away, as if they were not borne here by pallbearers, horses and hearse, but had walked here themselves. Their lives continue and of course life contimnues through our present-day visiting.

It is this which makes the place feel strangely alive. That is not to suggest of course that those interred within are indeed still living in the physical sense of the word, but that the memory of their lives is almost tangible. Many of those buried here would have enjoyed the finer things that Victorian life could offer, things which we modern-day visitors can only know through books, films and television. These people lived the lives that we can only imagine.

I do not wish however to over-romanticise their lives, by suggesting that they were all happy and spent their time at balls, dressed in splendid costumes; that their lives were indeed little more than costume dramas; that would be naive to say the least. But nonetheless, as I walked around the cemetery, I was aware as I read the names on the tumbledown, but nonetheless impressive monuments, that the names inscribed upon them - or at least some of them, particularly in the Circle of Lebanon (which reminded me, in some respects, of the Great Crescent in Bath which we'd visited the day before) - would have been known in society. They would have called to mind faces, voices, attitudes and characters where today they are labels for empty spaces.

The Victorian attitude to death - the strong belief in the afterlife which I've already mentioned - is clearly apparent in this cemetery; religion was of course very important to them. Strange then that they should choose to design their funerary monuments in the style of Ancient Egyptian tombs and temples. Perhaps this was as much down to the fashion of the time as anything else, but could it also be that the Ancient Egyptians' attitude to death and remembrance was somehow a confirmation of a continued existence? That's not to say - and this goes without saying - that Victorians shared in the Polytheistic beliefs of the Pharaohs, but that the very age and ancient duration of their (the Pharoahs') memory, which had and has spanned several millennia, promised an afterlife of a different kind; one that would be shared with living. Alongside the immortality of the soul, the endurance of the name was also important.

Such large and elaborate monuments are rebuttals of death itself. They are large and elaborate parts of the living world and, it could be argued, belie the uncertainty of a continued heavenly existence. They occupy a space in the land of the living, just as did the deceased, and when we read a name, we hear within our minds, albeit silently, the sound of a name that was spoken countless times. We hear it muffled, like bells were muffled at times of death.

I was reminded when reflecting on this of some work I did on Old Musical Instruments in the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford. It might sound obvious, but having studied materials used in the making of a Lira di Braccio as well as its shape, I became aware that it was so designed and made so as to make a sound. Names too are like this. They are given so as to be said.

Considering the perpetuity of names and memory amidst the slow convulsions of the ground , I coudn't help but think of the writings of Sir Thomas Browne, who in Urne Burial, published in 1658, wrote some of the most beautiful lines ever put down on the subject of mortality and remembrance:

"And therefore restlesse inquietude for the diuturnity of our memories unto present considerations seems vanity almost out of date, and superanuated peece of folly. We cannot hope to live so long in our names as some have done in their persons, one face of Janus holds no proportion unto the other. 'Tis too late to be ambitious. The great mutations of the world are acted, our time may be too short for our designes. To extend our memories by Monuments, whose death we dayly pray for, and whose durations we cannot hope, without injury to our expectations in the advent of the last day, were a contradiction to our beliefs. We whose generations are ordained in this setting part of time, are providentially taken off from such imaginations. And being necessitated to eye the remaining particle of futurity, are naturally constituted unto thoughts of the next world, and cannot excusably decline the consideration of that duration, which maketh Pyramids pillars of snow, and all that's past a moment.

[...]

There is no antidote against the Opium of time, which temporally considereth all things; Our Fathers finde their graves in our short memories, and sadly tell us how we may be buried in our Survivors. Grave-stones tell truth scarce fourty years; Generations passe while some trees stand, and old Families last not three Oaks. To be read by bare Inscriptions like many in Gruter, to hope for Eternity by Ænigmaticall Epithetes, or first letters of our names, to be studied by Antiquaries, who we were, and have new Names given us like many of the Mummies, are cold consolations unto the students of perpetuity, even by everlasting Languages.

[...]

Darknesse and light divide the course of time, and oblivion shares with memory a great part even of our living beings; we slightly remember our felicities, and the smartest stroaks of affliction leave but short smart upon us."

Walking in the Circle of Lebanon (reached by a gateway which itself could be a cast off from a production of Aida) one couldn't help but think of the families entombed within the sepulchres and, as I've already written, the lives which they led in Victorian society. The dead names carved in the stone were now as hollow and as empty as whatever lay behind the closed doors. And up beyond the Circle of Lebanon, the once wealthy inhabitants of the cemetery, far from the whirligig of their colourful lives were now just bones turned over in the soil. The trees, growing all around, seemed to be reaching with their roots deep into the ground like a man searching for change in his pockets, elbowing their way between the tombstones, staggering amongst the ivy trusses, as if driven mad by the idea of nothing.

In a recent study of another cemetery, this time in Wolvercote, Oxford, I came to the conclusion through a particular process of observation, that there were no such things as cemeteries. Well, of course there are cemeteries, but in a wider, more holistic view there is just the cycle of birth, life and death, whether those cycles are applied to the existences of human beings, animals or leaves. Where those leaves fall and where bodies are laid to rest is in the end quite irrelevant.

Highgate Cemetery itself was saved because of the threat of development. For many years it was left to decay, grown over with ivy, brambles and trees and suffering from vandalism. Unchecked, this cemetery could have disappeared along with all the names and their monuments. Thankfully, through the dedication of a relatively small number of people, the cemetery remains a place that we can visit today. But why is it we do so?

There are of course many reasons why a place like Highgate is of interest, not least from a purely historical perspective. The Victorian attitude towards death is a subject in itself, as are the styles and designs of the various funerary monuments. But for many of us who visit I think the reasons run much deeper.

The monuments we see were put there for us. As we walk, we try to imagine the lives of those who lived a century before we were even born, when we did not exist. And now, when the those who lived back then, exist only in the hollow shell of their names, so we cast our eyes to the future when our names will also no longer be spoken.

Back in 2007, Monika and I visited Pere Lachaise and Montmartre cemeteries in Paris, and reflecting on our visits I wrote:

"Cemeteries have something in common with old photographs, particularly when we consider the the writing of Roland Barthes who writes that photographs have within them the 'catastrophe of death,' and that, 'in the photograph, Time's immobilisation assumes only an excessive, monstrous mode: Time is engorged...'. In cemeteries too, Time is somehow engorged and contains in abundance that catastophe. One has the impression of time standing still, stopped by the dates of death carved into the many gravestones and tombs, yet we know, all too well, that time continues."

Perhaps it's Time, engorged within the bounds of the cemetery that skews the gravestones and monuments.

As I wrote earlier, the people buried in this cemetery lived lives that we can only imagine. Similarly, their existence now is one that we can only conceive at the very limits of our imaginations. My aunt once said to me, "you have to believe in something," ergo, you can't believe in nothing. And this is certainly true, I can't imagine nothing, whether that nothing is all the time before I was born or all the time that will come after my death. Cemeteries, like any historical record, building or object tell us there was something and that there always will be something.

Cemeteries point to both our past and future non-existence at a moment when we feel the present most acutely.

As Sir Thomas Browne wrote in his conclusion to Urne Burial:

"'Tis all one to lye in St Innocents* Church-yard, as in the Sands of Ægypt: Ready to be any thing, in the extasie of being ever, and as content with six foot as the Moles of Adrainus**.

*in Paris where bodies soon consume.
**A stately Mausoleum or sepulchral pyle built by Adrianus in Rome, where now standeth the Castle of St. Angelo.

As part of a new project, I took a walk to Headington, going via the house where I grew up. I haven't walked around that area for many years and was quite surprised at how run down it appeared to be, particularly my old house. Of course places change - it's only natural, but many houses and gardens in what was once a very well maintained street looked - for want of a better word - shabby. Like a lot of places nowadays, the front gardens have been abandoned, either to cars or, through apathy, to the weeds. Walls and fences have been torn down. They've collapsed or been removed. There's a profusion of signs too - a common complaint for many - which litter the streets; a far cry from the 1970s and 80s.

I was also aware as I walked of the huge increase in traffic in the area, at least since I'd lived there, particularly towards Old Headington which, I assume has something to do with the ever expanding John Radcliffe Hospital.

It was on my way to Old Headington that I became aware of two different qualities of memory - not specific ones as such, but those accumulated memories which help us know where we are. I've walked thousands of times up and down the streets where I lived (to and from school; to and from the shops), but on the road towards Old Headington my memories are much more of being driven, usually on my way to my Nan's in the back of Dad's car. Walking the street today, I noticed things that I'd never seen before whereas walking down the street on which I lived everything was much more familiar (even though they'd changed). This difference is due to the way memories of these places were formed. Of the street on which I lived they were formed, in the main, through walking. On the road to Old Headington, they were formed, again in the main, through a window in the back of the car.

As we walk, we accumulate a sense of place through the memories which are stored in the mind. These images are stronger and clearer when taken in through walking, and indeed when recalled through walking. The slower the pace (although not to the point of a standstill) the more we absorb of the world and thereby the better our sense of place.

The world today, or rather our interaction with and indeed within it is very 'nodal'. We travel from A to B, usually (but not always) as quickly as we can. The bit in between A and B is taken up, in the case of the car, with looking at the road ahead of us. I should point out that I am in no way anti-car, anti-train or anti-plane; I rely on them as anyone does; my point is that we rely on them far too much at the expense of our engagement with the world around us.

When we walk from A to B however, we don't 'get' just A and B but everything in between. The act of walking 'anchors' our destination and the place from which we travel, positioning them in the world. We have time to think, to see and to accumulate a sense of place. We have time to engage with the world and thereby position ourselves within it.

Whilst studying the Old London Road for another project, I began to get an understanding of how slowing our life down helps us to engage with the world around us. I also became aware of how roads today are much different to those in the past. Journeys were slower and roads were very much more a connection between two places. This may sound like a truism, but what I mean is that today, one could travel for mile after mile on roads without actually getting anywhere at all. Destination is not something built into the fabric of the road - something which I felt was very much the case on the Old London Road. Again I should point out that I am not in favour (were it possible) of a return to bumpy, uncomfortable, 16 hour journeys to London.

When the pace of life was slower, when people walked more than they did, I wonder whether their sense of place in the world was different (physical as opposed to social). Again I don't want to sound as if I'm being naively romantic about the past - it was often grim and difficult to say the very least, but I do think it must have been the case that the world was perceived very differently, not because of the lack of technologies such as the camera, the internet, film or television per se, but because of the pace. Technology of course is a contributing factor to the increased pace of life (and not just through transport). Increasingly we use our mobile phones or email to contact one another (and a great thing both of them are too). But again, this form of contact reduces the world to nodes, to A and B. In the days before such technologies (even when phones were abundant - this applies to a time not so long ago) if we wanted to speak with someone, we would go to meet them, or write them a letter. Either way, our words were physical; they had a place in the world; it wasn't just about A to B but, as with walking, A through to B.

I think what I've gleaned through my ramblings - both physical and verbal - is that we are missing the bits in between. Everything is being reduced to A, B and C. Where there are bit in between, they are little more than a hinterland, glimpses of which we snatch as we travel along roads, motorways, train tracks or even through the air. This brings me back to the houses of which I spoke earlier. They have the appearance, even to the walker, of something that is seen in transit, at speed. Even if one looks for a period of time at one of the houses I saw today (again by no means all of them) it's as if one is looking through the window of a passing car.

During this week of Remembrance, a few days after the 90th anniversary of the end of the First World War, I've been thinking about how it is that an event which happened almost a century ago still holds such a powerful draw on our consciences today. What is it that makes the Great War seem anything but distant when events which proceeded it only by a few years seem twice as far in the past?

In the last couple of days I've been continuing my research into my great-great-uncle Jonah Rogers, who was killed on the 8th May 1915 at the Battle of Frezenberg Ridge.

I have now been able to locate the positions he held as part of the 2nd Monmouthshire Battalion, on the day of the battle, being as they were part of the 12th Brigade in the 4th Division (thanks to Martyn Gibson and David Nicholas for their help with this).

In a 'History of the 2nd Battalion Monmouthshire Regiment,' compiled by Captain G.A. Brett, D.S.O., M.C., I read the following account of the battle in which Jonah lost his life.

"By the 8th May the British had withdrawn from the most advanced points of the Ypres salient, and the Germans, striving to obliterate the salient completely, made further determined efforts to gain ground. Desperate fighting ensued, the six days, 8th to 13th May, of the Battle of Frezenberg Ridge, giving many anxious hours to British commanders. When the storm broke the Battalion was on the right of the brigade still holding Mouse Trap Farm..."

Looking at a diagram of the Battle of Frezenberg Ridge, one can see clearly where the Battalion would have been stationed; to the left of the 84th Brigade at Mouse Trap Farm.

The more I 'get to know' Jonah, the more the war as an historic event, changes. Whereas before I could only know it as a thing in its own right, an homogenous mass observed from a distance, like a planet in the night sky, now, with a shift in focus, I see Jonah first, and then, through him the war. The telescope becomes in effect, a microscope, with Jonah the lens through which the war, in all its millions of parts, is magnified.

I do not know the exact details of how Jonah died. Given the ferocity of the artillery bombardment and the use prior to this of poison gas, there are any number of possibilities. And although knowing the nature of his death would add to the emotional weight of his story, it is the possibility of pinning down the location of his death which makes more of an impact upon me. It serves to make him - and the war - more vivid, more real. By locating him in the places where he lived and where he died, and by alternating one's thoughts between the two, one can imagine too his loved ones, shifting their thoughts between memories of him at home and thoughts of him at war. And in that space between - a kind of No Man's Land - one can locate their fears and their prayers. The same can be said for Jonah, who no doubt during the months he was at the Front, staring across at the enemy, thought a great deal of the place in which he lived.

For his family, left behind in Hafodyrynys, the war could only be imagined but would permeate everything they did. Whatever they did, however mundane, there would be the war. Even in the landscape, in its shape, its colour, its sounds, the war would be contained but never spilled beyond the outlines. And in these shapes and spaces, their hopes and fears would vie against each other.

Perhaps the fact I can share at least some of this space, in the movement of my own thoughts between the place he lived and the place he died, helps explain the reason why, although I know what happened to him, and where and when it happened, I still feel, when reading about the war prior to May 1915, a sense of concern for his wellbeing. If I read any account of the war after the day he died, every word is permeated with his absence. That is not to say I mourn as such (as his immediate family would of course have mourned) but I do sense his absence, I do sense the anxiety of his separation (in the end, eternal separation) from home.

Without a known grave, this separation - his death - must have been all the more difficult for his family. On the gravestone of his older brother, William, who died aged 10 in 1897, the following inscription has been added:

Also of Pte. Jonah Rogers, 2nd Mon Regt. Son of the above Killed in Action in France, May 8th 1915.

Jonah has no known grave, save that within the minds of those of us who remember him. Perhaps then, my concern is for the wellbeing of his memory?

We must all as individuals continue to remember. We must remember that the millions who died in the slaughter, were not an anonymous mass brought into play by History (just as we are not an anonymous mass brought together to remember) but young individuals, taken from their homes and loved ones; individuals to whom we are all related. A million British and Commonwealth soldiers lost their lives in the War. A million graves, known and unknown lay in the fields of Flanders and France. Back home, a million holes, will only ever be filled with the thoughts of those who come after them. Thoughts that pass with our passing. Holes to be filled again by successive generations.

Photographs taken at installation sites (Deadman's Walk and Botanic Gardens) this weekend.